Anderson v. Duke Energy Corporation, (4th Cir. 2011)

Status: Not Published

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1824

DORIS N. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger,

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK)

Submitted: March 16, 2011 Decided: April 13, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doris N. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Stricklin Cox,

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Winston-Salem, North

Carolina; John James Doyle, Jr., Candice S. Wooten, CONSTANGY,

BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court's order affirming the clerk's taxation of costs and awarding costs to the Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No.

3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK (W.D.N.C. June 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED