Abbott v. Guenther, (4th Cir. 2011)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1405
PAUL ABBOTT; ELAINE BARKER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
DANIEL GUENTHER, Esquire,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-
cv-02642-RWT)
Submitted: March 23, 2011 Decided: April 7, 2011
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Abbott, Elaine Barker, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Patrick
Johnson, ECCLESTON & WOLF PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker appeal the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. Guenther, No. 8:09-cv-02642-RWT (D. Md. Mar.
10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
