Aaron vs. Intertek Testing Svc, (5th Cir. 2003)
* District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUITNo. 02-40701 CASANDRA AARON; ADA WILLIAMS; ALBERTA WASHINGTON; ALBERTA J. TRAMMEL; ALICE MARTIN MORGAN; ET AL.; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC.; MARTIN DALE JEFFUS; JAMES NEIL MAYHEW; MICHAEL LYNN LUDWICK; GESHENG DAI; MELISSA K. DUNCAN; MICHELLE GEORGINA DELGADO-BROWN; DALE THOMAS MCQUEEN; SHEILA ANN PETTY; RODNEY L. ROLAND; WILLIAM S. WINGERT; CHUKWUJCKWUN ANOZIE; VICTOR DEANTHONY LITTLES; VALERIE HONG TRUONG, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 2-01-CV-80-DF March 17, 2003 Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and VANCE * , District Judge. PER CURIAM: ** After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court correctly denied plaintiffÂ’s motion to remand and granted defendantsÂ’ motion to dismiss the suit. Essentially for reasons stated by the district court in itÂ’s December 18, 2001 Order, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED.